Elizabeth
died in 1603, without having named her successor.
Cecil was present at her death-bed, and
we only have his word for it that, when
he enquired of the dying Queen whether James
should succeed her, she made a motion indicating
her assent. Cecil lost no time in ensuring
that his long efforts to ingratiate himself
with James would bear fruit. He immediately
issued orders for the accession of James
to be publicly proclaimed throughout the
Kingdom, and sent a despatch-rider to Scotland
to summon the new King, then himself set
out to meet James on his progress to London.
In
due course, Cecil was to become the power
behind James's throne, just as his father,
Burghley, had been the power behind Elizabeth's.
Aside from Cecil, James's principal courtiers
were characterised by two qualities - their
outstanding good looks, combined with an
almost total ineptitude in matters of public
administration. His first favourite, Sir
Robert Carr - later Earl of Somerset - was
rewarded with the gift of Raleigh's country
house, Sherborne, following the forfeiture
of Raleigh's worldly possessions upon his
being attainted for treason. After Carr
fell from grace, he was displaced by Sir
George Villiers - later Earl, then Marquis,
and finally Duke of Buckingham. The King
was not alone in his susceptibility to the
attractions of Buckingham's physical beauty:
Laud, the Archbishop of Canterbury, recorded
"a delightful dream in which Villiers
came into his bed";and even Bacon wrote,
in response toa letter from Villiers, that
"the flame it hath kindled in me will
never be extinguished". King James
wrote to Buckingham, whom he nicknamed "Steenie",
as "my only sweet and dear child",
as "sweetheart", and even as "wife".
|
|
the
King and his "toy-boys" (above)
Jame I (upper right)
Robert Carr (lower right)
George Villiers
|
With
Essex out of the way, and with the King's
"toy boys" providing no real threat
to Cecil's control of the government, only
Raleigh could be seen as a serious challenge
to his power and influence under the new
regime. But, quite apart from Raleigh's
own (honourable but foolish) refusal to
accept friendly overtures from Lennox on
James's behalf, Cecil had well and truly
poisoned the well between James and Raleigh.
In secret correspondence with James in the
last years of Elizabeth's life, Cecil had
insinuated that Raleigh was opposed to James's
succession, preferring one of the female
claimants - either Lady Arabella Stuart,
who had a more direct lineal claim, or possibly
the Spanish Infanta - whom Raleigh might
be able to manipulate as successfully as
he had manipulated Elizabeth. Similar insinuations
had been communicated to James by Essex
- who also implicated Cecil as favouring
the Infanta - and by Lord Admiral Howard
(later the Earl of Nottingham). Thus, when
James and Raleigh first met, James was already
thoroughly prejudiced against Raleigh, making
the famous pun: "Raleigh, Raleigh,
O my soul, mon, I have heard but rawly of
thee".
Perhaps
there is another reason for James's animosity
to Raleigh, namely Raleigh's reputation
for having introduced the smoking of tobacco
to England. In an essay published in 1604,
entitled A Counterblaste to Tobacco,
James issued what was probably the first
"Government Health Warning" on
this subject, describing smoking as "a
custom loathsome to the eye, hateful to
the nose, harmful to the brain, dangerous
to the lungs, and in the black stinking
fume thereof nearest resembling the horrible
stygian smoke of the pit that is bottomless".
In what was quite possibly a reference to
Raleigh, James's essay mentioned "the
foolish and groundless first entry thereof
into this Kingdom", observing that
"It was neither brought in by king,
great conqueror, nor learned doctor of physic".
Title-page
to A Counterblaste to Tobacco
But
Raleigh was a political survivor. He had
reversed Elizabeth's disfavour more than
once, and outlasted all of her principal
courtiers apart from Cecil. Realistically,
there was little chance that Raleigh would
ever overcome the new King's animosity to
him; but that risk was not one which Cecil
was prepared to take.
Possibly,
Cecil had another reason for wanting Raleigh
out of the way. His own role in bringing
down Essex was not calculated to endear
him to the new King, and James - a homosexual
or bisexual with a particular attraction
to dashing young men of good looks and heroic
attainments - formed a strong posthumous
attachment to his "martyr". At
his trial, Essex had attempted to deflect
attention from his own treason by declaring
that he could "prove thus much from
Sir Robert Cecil's own mouth: That he, speaking
to one of his fellow councillors, should
say that none in the world but the Infanta
of Spain had the right to the Crown of England."
There can be little doubt that Cecil did,
indeed, "hedge his bets". Throughout
his time in government service, and even
whilst England was at war with Spain, Cecil
was in receipt of a Spanish "pension"
- that is, regular bribes from the Spanish
Crown. If there were any truth in Essex's
allegation that Cecil and Raleigh supported
the Infanta's claim to the succession, Raleigh
was the only man alive who could betray
Cecil. Cecil needed Raleigh eliminated.
|